Quote:Senate OKs legislative pay hike
by The Associated Press
Print Story
Email Story
While leaders of teachers unions waited at the Capitol for word about a possible 3.5 percent raise for their members, the Senate voted to hike lawmakers' annual pay by 33 percent, to $20,000.
The raise bill came Thursday morning from the Senate Finance Committee, which followed some of the advice of The Citizens Legislative Compensation Commission, according to Chairman Walt Helmick, D-Pocahontas.
The commission recommended increasing both annual salaries and various per-day and expense payments for the 100 delegates and 34 senators, who now receive a base pay of $15,000.
If passed, the proposal would raise legislators' salaries to $20,000. The commission originally recommended to boost pay to $25,000 by 2009, which would have made West Virginia the highest-paid part-time legislature of its kind in the country.
Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin said the pay for the part-time Legislature goes toward the expenses members incur making constituent visits and traveling their districts. The bill provides for paying $5,000 a month during January, February and March and then $625 a month in April through November. It also includes mileage reimbursements for lawmakers.
"You have to compensate people,'' Tomblin said. "This isn't the 60-day-a-year job it might have been 20 years ago.''
That likely won't sit well with teachers and other public employees who have been pushing hard this session for raises, union representatives said.
"I can't imagine it not rubbing people the wrong way,'' said West Virginia Education Association President Chuck DeLauder, who was waiting outside the House of Delegates for a vote on the bill giving teachers a raise.
Senators said they expect some criticism.
"Is there ever a good time for legislators to give themselves a pay raise?'' asked Tomblin, D-Logan.
The measure now goes to the House of Delegates.
The West Virginia Legislature last voted to raise its pay in 1994, when it had been $6,500. The legislation sparked a public outcry and an unsuccessful legal challenge.
As a separate branch of government, the Legislature is the only body that can set its pay.
"It would be nice to put it in the hands of somebody else,'' said Sen. Karen Facemyer, R-Jackson, who voted for the bill. "But we have to act on it.''
Matt Turner, a spokesman for Gov. Joe Manchin, said Manchin is waiting to see what the House of Delegates does with the bill before making a decision.
Meanwhile, Delegate Ron Thompson, D-Raleigh, said in a statement Thursday he doesn't plan to take any pay for the current session. Thompson has missed virtually the entire session and was briefly removed from office before being reinstated.
"I cannot fathom anybody, especially specific House members, ever thinking I was going to accept full pay for not being there,'' he said. "How in the world could I do that in good conscience?''
Thompson said he plans to attend some of the few remaining House floor sessions, and then work with the House clerk's office to settle on an appropriate amount of pay for the remainder of 2007. Thompson was not present at House floor sessions Thursday morning or afternoon.
Thompson has said he is suffering from clinical depression. He has missed virtually every legislative function since the close of the 2006 session, although he did take the oath of office at the Capitol this month.
Don't you love politicians. This mirrored the US Congress. They debated and debated to raising soldiers' pay and benefits and giving them much needed military resources...all turned down. Yet every time the fiscally conservative, Republican controlled Congress brought up a pay hike for themselves they quickly and without much debate passed it. Isn't this like making murder dependents their own jury to decided their guilt or innocence. I really do believe we need to have laws that allow the American people vote on whether their politicians are doing a good enough job to get a raise. And it pains me to say it but Nancy Pelosi was the person that retracted the pay hikes saying it was wrong. However I think she had more of a "I'm taking a stance right off the bat to get in good with the undecideds" than it being right or wrong.
X